On 25/02/2025 04:00, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 02:36:11PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Since we have disabled RDMA + postcopy, it's safe to remove
>> the migration_in_postcopy()  that follows the migration_rdma().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>   migration/ram.c  | 2 +-
>>   migration/rdma.c | 5 +++--
>>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
>> index e07651aee8d..c363034c882 100644
>> --- a/migration/ram.c
>> +++ b/migration/ram.c
>> @@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ static int ram_save_target_page(RAMState *rs, 
>> PageSearchStatus *pss)
>>       int res;
>>   
>>       /* Hand over to RDMA first */
>> -    if (migrate_rdma() && !migration_in_postcopy()) {
> 
> This line was just added in previous patch.
> 
> Would it be better move 5/6 above, then somehow squash 2/3/4/7 so that it
> doesn't need to add something and got removed again? 

Yeah, it sound good to me.
I tried to reorder the pathes and squash previous 2 3 4 to a single one

So the new layout will be like below:

e5b1998ad30 migration: Add qtest for migration over RDMA
9a1b87e2db6 migration: Unfold control_save_page()  << this one squashed 
previous 2/3/4
b6ccd49e934 migration/rdma: Remove redundant migration_in_postcopy checks
c7c4209db6f migration: disable RDMA + postcopy-ram
0463b54d7f9 migration: Add migration_capabilities_and_transport_compatible() 
helper
21c76dcabee migration: Prioritize RDMA in ram_save_target_page()


Thanks
Zhijian


> I feel like the four
> patches can be squashed into 1 or 2 instead when reorder them.
> 
>> +    if (migrate_rdma()) {
>>           res = rdma_control_save_page(pss->pss_channel, pss->block->offset,
>>                                        offset, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
>>   
>> diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
>> index c6876347e1e..0349dd4a8b8 100644
>> --- a/migration/rdma.c
>> +++ b/migration/rdma.c
>> @@ -3826,7 +3826,7 @@ int rdma_block_notification_handle(QEMUFile *f, const 
>> char *name)
>>   
>>   int rdma_registration_start(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags)
>>   {
>> -    if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) {
>> +    if (!migrate_rdma()) {
>>           return 0;
>>       }
>>   
>> @@ -3858,7 +3858,8 @@ int rdma_registration_stop(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags)
>>       RDMAControlHeader head = { .len = 0, .repeat = 1 };
>>       int ret;
>>   
>> -    if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) {
>> +    /* Hand over to RDMA first */
>> +    if (!migrate_rdma()) {
>>           return 0;
>>       }
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.44.0
>>
> 

Reply via email to