On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 9:40 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > missing_const_for_fn is not necessarily useful or good. For example in > a private API you can always add const later, and in a public API > it can be unnecessarily restrictive to annotate everything with const > (blocking further improvements to the API). > > Nevertheless, QEMU turns it on because qemu_api uses const quite > aggressively and therefore it can be handy to have as much as possible > annotated with const. Outside qemu_api though, not so much: devices > are self contained consumers and if there is nothing that could use > their functions in const contexts that were not anticipated. > > Since missing_const_for_fn can be a bit noisy and trigger on trivial > functions that no one would ever call in const context, do not > turn it on everywhere and only keep it in qemu_api as a special case. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>