On 2/6/25 20:13, Corvin Köhne wrote:
> From: Corvin Köhne <c.koe...@beckhoff.com>
> 
> We're currently missing some GPU IDs already supported by the i915
> kernel driver. Additionally, we've treated IvyBridge as gen 6 in the
> past. According to i915 it's gen 7 [1]. It shouldn't cause any issues
> yet because we treat gen 6 and gen 7 the same way. Nevertheless, we
> should use the correct generation to avoid any confusion.
> 
> [1] 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c?h=v6.13#n330
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corvin Köhne <c.koe...@beckhoff.com>
> ---
>  hw/vfio/igd.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/igd.c b/hw/vfio/igd.c
> index e5d7006ce2..7bbf018efc 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/igd.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/igd.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct igd_device {
>  
>  static const struct igd_device igd_devices[] = {
>      INTEL_SNB_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 6),
> -    INTEL_IVB_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 6),
> +    INTEL_IVB_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 7),
>      INTEL_HSW_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 7),
>      INTEL_VLV_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 7),
>      INTEL_BDW_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 8),
> @@ -73,8 +73,10 @@ static const struct igd_device igd_devices[] = {
>      INTEL_BXT_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 9),
>      INTEL_KBL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 9),
>      INTEL_CFL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 9),
> +    INTEL_WHL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 9),
>      INTEL_CML_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 9),
>      INTEL_GLK_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 9),
> +    INTEL_CNL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 9),
>      INTEL_ICL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 11),
>      INTEL_EHL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 11),
>      INTEL_JSL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 11),
> @@ -86,6 +88,8 @@ static const struct igd_device igd_devices[] = {
>      INTEL_RPLS_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 12),
>      INTEL_RPLU_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 12),
>      INTEL_RPLP_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 12),
> +    INTEL_ARL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 12),
> +    INTEL_MTL_IDS(IGD_DEVICE, 12),

According to i915 driver [1], DSM becomes a part of BAR 2 in MTL/ARL.
All accesses to DSM from CPU should be via BAR I think. BARs are
mapped in guest address space to host address space by QEMU when
passthrough, as a common behavior, just like normal discrete GPUs.

Though IGD takes a memory region as DSM, it should be reserved by
firmware and not directly accessible by host also, like GTT memory,
since arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c no longer reserves DSM for MTL/
ARL.

Appling the BDSM quirk would bring issues to MTL/ARL. Probably there
is no special workarounds needed for MTL and later IGD devices. But
intel hasn't made the MTL/ARL/LNL datasheet publicly available yet,
I can not confirm it :( If Intel really decided to not using BDSM on
MTL+, we can just have a fixed id list for igd devices.

[1] 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/69b8923f5003664e3ffef102e73333edfa2abdcf/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c#L918

>  };
>  
>  /*


Reply via email to