On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:58 AM Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 9:36 PM Rajnesh Kanwal <rkan...@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > CTR entries are accessed using ctrsource, ctrtarget and ctrdata
> > registers using smcsrind/sscsrind extension. This commits extends
> > the csrind extension to support CTR registers.
> >
> > ctrsource is accessible through xireg CSR, ctrtarget is accessible
> > through xireg1 and ctrdata is accessible through xireg2 CSR.
> >
> > CTR supports maximum depth of 256 entries which are accessed using
> > xiselect range 0x200 to 0x2ff.
> >
> > This commits also adds properties to enable CTR extension. CTR can be
> > enabled using smctr=true and ssctr=true now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajnesh Kanwal <rkan...@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/cpu.c         |  26 +++++++-
> >  target/riscv/csr.c         | 150 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c |  11 ++++
> >  3 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > index 
> > 2a4f285a974ffc62e7f3e938691dbffe376a7e46..751029e924d4690aaa5de65456fd5a5ec25b916a
> >  100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > @@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
> >      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(sstvala, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, has_priv_1_12),
> >      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(sstvecd, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, has_priv_1_12),
> >      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svade, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_svade),
> > +    ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smctr, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smctr),
> > +    ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssctr, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssctr),
> >      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svadu, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svadu),
> >      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
> >      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
> > @@ -1481,6 +1483,8 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = 
> > {
> >      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smcdeleg", ext_smcdeleg, false),
> >      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("sscsrind", ext_sscsrind, false),
> >      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssccfg", ext_ssccfg, false),
> > +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smctr", ext_smctr, false),
> > +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssctr", ext_ssctr, false),
>
> This should be the very last patch (once everything is supported)
>
> Otherwise
>
> Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
>
> Alistair

I am sending v6 as I will have to rebase this series on the latest
riscv-to-apply.for-upstream. I will fix the order of patches in that.

Thanks
Rajnesh

>
> >      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zifencei", ext_zifencei, true),
> >      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zicfilp", ext_zicfilp, false),
> >      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zicfiss", ext_zicfiss, false),
> > @@ -2656,6 +2660,26 @@ static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule SSCFG_IMPLIED = {
> >      },
> >  };
> >
> > +static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule SMCTR_IMPLIED = {
> > +    .ext = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_smctr),
> > +    .implied_misa_exts = RVS,
> > +    .implied_multi_exts = {
> > +        CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_sscsrind),
> > +
> > +        RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END
> > +    },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule SSCTR_IMPLIED = {
> > +    .ext = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_ssctr),
> > +    .implied_misa_exts = RVS,
> > +    .implied_multi_exts = {
> > +        CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_sscsrind),
> > +
> > +        RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END
> > +    },
> > +};
> > +
> >  RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *riscv_misa_ext_implied_rules[] = {
> >      &RVA_IMPLIED, &RVD_IMPLIED, &RVF_IMPLIED,
> >      &RVM_IMPLIED, &RVV_IMPLIED, NULL
> > @@ -2674,7 +2698,7 @@ RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule 
> > *riscv_multi_ext_implied_rules[] = {
> >      &ZVFH_IMPLIED, &ZVFHMIN_IMPLIED, &ZVKN_IMPLIED,
> >      &ZVKNC_IMPLIED, &ZVKNG_IMPLIED, &ZVKNHB_IMPLIED,
> >      &ZVKS_IMPLIED,  &ZVKSC_IMPLIED, &ZVKSG_IMPLIED, &SSCFG_IMPLIED,
> > -    NULL
> > +    &SMCTR_IMPLIED, &SSCTR_IMPLIED, NULL
> >  };
> >
> >  static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
> > index 
> > a399d55740c7259cd1c1d893687541e23ea3ce52..d7b520099563d3a680c5b75dc987881caab95407
> >  100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
> > @@ -2399,6 +2399,13 @@ static bool xiselect_cd_range(target_ulong isel)
> >      return (ISELECT_CD_FIRST <= isel && isel <= ISELECT_CD_LAST);
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool xiselect_ctr_range(int csrno, target_ulong isel)
> > +{
> > +    /* MIREG-MIREG6 for the range 0x200-0x2ff are not used by CTR. */
> > +    return CTR_ENTRIES_FIRST <= isel && isel <= CTR_ENTRIES_LAST &&
> > +           csrno < CSR_MIREG;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int rmw_iprio(target_ulong xlen,
> >                       target_ulong iselect, uint8_t *iprio,
> >                       target_ulong *val, target_ulong new_val,
> > @@ -2444,6 +2451,124 @@ static int rmw_iprio(target_ulong xlen,
> >      return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int rmw_ctrsource(CPURISCVState *env, int isel, target_ulong *val,
> > +                          target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> > +{
> > +    /*
> > +     * CTR arrays are treated as circular buffers and TOS always points to 
> > next
> > +     * empty slot, keeping TOS - 1 always pointing to latest entry. Given 
> > entry
> > +     * 0 is always the latest one, traversal is a bit different here. See 
> > the
> > +     * below example.
> > +     *
> > +     * Depth = 16.
> > +     *
> > +     * idx    [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] 
> > [F]
> > +     * TOS                                 H
> > +     * entry   6   5   4   3   2   1   0   F   E   D   C   B   A   9   8   
> > 7
> > +     */
> > +    const uint64_t entry = isel - CTR_ENTRIES_FIRST;
> > +    const uint64_t depth = 16 << get_field(env->sctrdepth, SCTRDEPTH_MASK);
> > +    uint64_t idx;
> > +
> > +    /* Entry greater than depth-1 is read-only zero */
> > +    if (entry >= depth) {
> > +        if (val) {
> > +            *val = 0;
> > +        }
> > +        return 0;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    idx = get_field(env->sctrstatus, SCTRSTATUS_WRPTR_MASK);
> > +    idx = (idx - entry - 1) & (depth - 1);
> > +
> > +    if (val) {
> > +        *val = env->ctr_src[idx];
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    env->ctr_src[idx] = (env->ctr_src[idx] & ~wr_mask) | (new_val & 
> > wr_mask);
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rmw_ctrtarget(CPURISCVState *env, int isel, target_ulong *val,
> > +                          target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> > +{
> > +    /*
> > +     * CTR arrays are treated as circular buffers and TOS always points to 
> > next
> > +     * empty slot, keeping TOS - 1 always pointing to latest entry. Given 
> > entry
> > +     * 0 is always the latest one, traversal is a bit different here. See 
> > the
> > +     * below example.
> > +     *
> > +     * Depth = 16.
> > +     *
> > +     * idx    [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] 
> > [F]
> > +     * head                                H
> > +     * entry   6   5   4   3   2   1   0   F   E   D   C   B   A   9   8   
> > 7
> > +     */
> > +    const uint64_t entry = isel - CTR_ENTRIES_FIRST;
> > +    const uint64_t depth = 16 << get_field(env->sctrdepth, SCTRDEPTH_MASK);
> > +    uint64_t idx;
> > +
> > +    /* Entry greater than depth-1 is read-only zero */
> > +    if (entry >= depth) {
> > +        if (val) {
> > +            *val = 0;
> > +        }
> > +        return 0;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    idx = get_field(env->sctrstatus, SCTRSTATUS_WRPTR_MASK);
> > +    idx = (idx - entry - 1) & (depth - 1);
> > +
> > +    if (val) {
> > +        *val = env->ctr_dst[idx];
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    env->ctr_dst[idx] = (env->ctr_dst[idx] & ~wr_mask) | (new_val & 
> > wr_mask);
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rmw_ctrdata(CPURISCVState *env, int isel, target_ulong *val,
> > +                        target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> > +{
> > +    /*
> > +     * CTR arrays are treated as circular buffers and TOS always points to 
> > next
> > +     * empty slot, keeping TOS - 1 always pointing to latest entry. Given 
> > entry
> > +     * 0 is always the latest one, traversal is a bit different here. See 
> > the
> > +     * below example.
> > +     *
> > +     * Depth = 16.
> > +     *
> > +     * idx    [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] 
> > [F]
> > +     * head                                H
> > +     * entry   6   5   4   3   2   1   0   F   E   D   C   B   A   9   8   
> > 7
> > +     */
> > +    const uint64_t entry = isel - CTR_ENTRIES_FIRST;
> > +    const uint64_t mask = wr_mask & CTRDATA_MASK;
> > +    const uint64_t depth = 16 << get_field(env->sctrdepth, SCTRDEPTH_MASK);
> > +    uint64_t idx;
> > +
> > +    /* Entry greater than depth-1 is read-only zero */
> > +    if (entry >= depth) {
> > +        if (val) {
> > +            *val = 0;
> > +        }
> > +        return 0;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    idx = get_field(env->sctrstatus, SCTRSTATUS_WRPTR_MASK);
> > +    idx = (idx - entry - 1) & (depth - 1);
> > +
> > +    if (val) {
> > +        *val = env->ctr_data[idx];
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    env->ctr_data[idx] = (env->ctr_data[idx] & ~mask) | (new_val & mask);
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static RISCVException rmw_xireg_aia(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >                           target_ulong isel, target_ulong *val,
> >                           target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> > @@ -2596,6 +2721,27 @@ done:
> >      return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int rmw_xireg_ctr(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> > +                        target_ulong isel, target_ulong *val,
> > +                        target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> > +{
> > +    if (!riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smctr && !riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_ssctr) {
> > +        return -EINVAL;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (csrno == CSR_SIREG || csrno == CSR_VSIREG) {
> > +        return rmw_ctrsource(env, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> > +    } else if (csrno == CSR_SIREG2 || csrno == CSR_VSIREG2) {
> > +        return rmw_ctrtarget(env, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> > +    } else if (csrno == CSR_SIREG3 || csrno == CSR_VSIREG3) {
> > +        return rmw_ctrdata(env, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> > +    } else if (val) {
> > +        *val = 0;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * rmw_xireg_csrind: Perform indirect access to xireg and xireg2-xireg6
> >   *
> > @@ -2607,11 +2753,13 @@ static int rmw_xireg_csrind(CPURISCVState *env, int 
> > csrno,
> >                                target_ulong isel, target_ulong *val,
> >                                target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> >  {
> > -    int ret = -EINVAL;
> >      bool virt = csrno == CSR_VSIREG ? true : false;
> > +    int ret = -EINVAL;
> >
> >      if (xiselect_cd_range(isel)) {
> >          ret = rmw_xireg_cd(env, csrno, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> > +    } else if (xiselect_ctr_range(csrno, isel)) {
> > +        ret = rmw_xireg_ctr(env, csrno, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> >      } else {
> >          /*
> >           * As per the specification, access to unimplented region is 
> > undefined
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > index 
> > 2b57aa4d1704b176f314dbe0b120cfcc943bf4f8..575b5692c7f68a5f6d37edbc17269e41f496f682
> >  100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > @@ -652,6 +652,17 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, 
> > Error **errp)
> >          return;
> >      }
> >
> > +    if ((cpu->cfg.ext_smctr || cpu->cfg.ext_ssctr) &&
> > +        (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVS) || !cpu->cfg.ext_sscsrind)) {
> > +        if (cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_smctr)) ||
> > +            cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_ssctr))) {
> > +            error_setg(errp, "Smctr and Ssctr require S-mode and 
> > Sscsrind");
> > +            return;
> > +        }
> > +        cpu->cfg.ext_smctr = false;
> > +        cpu->cfg.ext_ssctr = false;
> > +    }
> > +
> >      /*
> >       * Disable isa extensions based on priv spec after we
> >       * validated and set everything we need.
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >

Reply via email to