On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:28:34AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nicolin Chen <nicol...@nvidia.com> > > I wonder if we can make some progress in Feb? If so, we can start > > to wrap up the iommufd uAPI patches for HWPT, which was a part of > > intel's series but never got sent since their emulated series is > > seemingly still pending? > > I think these are the 5 patches that we require from Intel pass-through > series, > > vfio/iommufd: Implement [at|de]tach_hwpt handlers > vfio/iommufd: Implement HostIOMMUDeviceClass::realize_late() handler > HostIOMMUDevice: Introduce realize_late callback > vfio/iommufd: Add properties and handlers to TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD > backends/iommufd: Add helpers for invalidating user-managed HWPT > Hi Zhenzhong, > > Just wondering what your plans are for the above patches. If it make sense > and you > are fine with it, I think it is a good idea one of us can pick up those from > that series > and sent out separately so that it can get some review and take it forward.
+1 These uAPI/backend patches can be sent in a smaller series to get reviewed prior to the intel/arm series. It can merge with either of the intel/arm series that runs faster at the end of the day :) Nicolin
