On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:52:56AM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> Functionally, the ordering of container/subregion finalization matters if
> some device tries to a container during finalization. In such a case,
|
^ something is missing here, feel free to complete this.
> removing subregions from the container at random timing can result in an
> unexpected behavior. There is little chance to have such a scenario but we
> should stay the safe side if possible.
It sounds like a future feature, and I'm not sure we'll get there, so I
don't worry that much. Keeping refcount core idea simple is still very
attractive to me. I still prefer we have complete MR refcounting iff when
necessary. It's also possible it'll never happen to QEMU.
--
Peter Xu
