John Snow <js...@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025, 3:00 AM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> John Snow <js...@redhat.com> writes: [...] >> > Modifying freeform syntax to be purely rST that isn't modified or rewritten >> > at all has benefits: >> > >> > - No need to mangle or multiplex source line source information >> > - Less code >> > - More straightforward >> > >> > I'm quite happy to do it later, is there some kind of "ticket" system you'd >> > tolerate using for tracking nits for cleanup? I *will* forget if we don't >> > listify and track them, I'm sorry (but wise enough) to admit. I just don't >> > want to get sidetracked on little side-quests right now. (Quite prone to >> > this...) >> >> TODO comment in code this would obviously kill? Not exactly a ticket >> system... >> >> scripts/qapi/TODO? Still not a ticket system... >> > > If a TODO is fine (and you don't mind pinging me in the future), then the > comment I left in the visit_freeform() function (it's in another patch) > explaining that the custom parser can be dropped after we sunset the old > qapidoc is likely sufficient if I just add a "TODO". > > Sound good?
Yes. [...]
