On 12/23/24 13:01, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
在2024年12月23日十二月 下午3:15,Richard Henderson写道:
On 12/22/24 15:40, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ static bool gen_ll(DisasContext *ctx, arg_rr_i *a, MemOp mop)
TCGv src1 = gpr_src(ctx, a->rj, EXT_NONE);
TCGv t0 = make_address_i(ctx, src1, a->imm);
...
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ static bool gen_sc(DisasContext *ctx, arg_rr_i *a, MemOp mop)
TCGLabel *l1 = gen_new_label();
TCGLabel *done = gen_new_label();
- tcg_gen_addi_tl(t0, src1, a->imm);
+ tcg_gen_mov_tl(t0, src1);
+ t0 = make_address_i(ctx, t0, a->imm);
The move before make_address_i is not required.
See the similar code just above in gen_ll.
I think it’s necessary, I thought the same and end up spending hours to track
down the problem.
make_address_i won’t make a new temp_reg if imm is zero.
Correct.
So when imm is 0 src1 and src2 is the same tcg reg the value will be clobbered
by cmpxchg,
causing a couple of tcg tests to fail.
I think only way to ensure t0 is a new temp reg is to perform a move here.
The correct thing to do is not to re-use the same temporary for both uses.
- TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
- tcg_gen_addi_tl(t0, src1, a->imm);
+ TCGv t0 = make_address_i(ctx, src1, a->imm);
tcg_gen_brcond_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, t0, cpu_lladdr, l1);
tcg_gen_movi_tl(dest, 0);
tcg_gen_br(done);
gen_set_label(l1);
tcg_gen_mov_tl(val, src2);
/* generate cmpxchg */
+ t0 = tcg_temp_new();
tcg_gen_atomic_cmpxchg_tl(t0, cpu_lladdr, cpu_llval,
val, ctx->mem_idx, mop);
r~