Nabih Estefan <nabiheste...@google.com> writes: > From what I can tell this is the same issue Thomas was looking at yes. > > I saw the failure on the master branch at the v9.2.0 tag (ae35f033) and just > re-tested it against (83aaec1d) and still see it. I haven't seen it be an > intermittent failure, it has failed 100% of the time that I have tested it > when > targeting arm-softmmu.
Could you please post the output of: QTEST_LOG=1 QTEST_TRACE="sse_*" QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-arm ./tests/qtest/sse-timer-test Also your compiler version. > > However, you are right that with Phillippe's series on top of my change the > bug is somehow re-introduced. Not sure what the protocol is here since > neither patch has landed I would like to figure out why this reproduces 100% for you (and some CI job) and 0% for me and others. Once this is clear we can merge this patch. As for the other series let's leave the issues there to be discussed in its own thread.
