On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 02:49, 陳韋任 <che...@iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:17:09PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:40, Xin Tong <xerox.time.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > that is possible. but if that is the case, why not split the tlb >> > walking and the tlb fill ? can anyone please confirm ? >> >> I sent a patch earlier that did something like that but it wasn't very >> successful: >> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-04/msg00992.html > > So functions like __ldb_mmu actually don't need to walk the TLB again?
Only when they are called from generated code, then the generated code has already checked that the address is not in the TLB. > Why you said the patch was't very successful? I don't others' comment > against the patch. Patch 4/4 created another function for TCG callers which skipped the lookup, called tlb_fill and then called the original helper. But GCC didn't want to inline the full helper into this TCG helper, instead added a call. For the call, the registers need to be shuffled. Also stack protector added protections to both TCG helper and the full helper. The machine code did not look efficient at all. Maybe the code could be inlined manually with macros. > > Regards, > chenwj > > -- > Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) > Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, > Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) > Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 > Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
