On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 19:10, Roque Arcudia Hernandez <roq...@google.com> wrote: > > Current watchdog is free running out of reset, this combined with the > fact that current implementation also ensures the counter is running > when programing WDOGLOAD creates issues when the firmware defer the > programing of WDOGCONTROL.INTEN much later after WDOGLOAD. Arm > Programmer's Model documentation states that INTEN is also the > counter enable: > > > INTEN > > > > Enable the interrupt event, WDOGINT. Set HIGH to enable the counter > > and the interrupt, or LOW to disable the counter and interrupt. > > Reloads the counter from the value in WDOGLOAD when the interrupt > > is enabled, after previously being disabled. > > Source of the time of writing: > > https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0479/d/apb-components/apb-watchdog/programmers-model
I see that the URL in the current sources https://developer.arm.com/products/system-design/system-design-kits/cortex-m-system-design-kit is no longer working -- would you mind including a patch that updates the URL in the comment at the top of the file to the new one https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0479/ please? > Signed-off-by: Roque Arcudia Hernandez <roq...@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Longfield <slongfi...@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Joe Komlodi <koml...@google.com> > --- > hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c > b/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c > index 7ad46f9410..e6ddc0a53b 100644 > --- a/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c > +++ b/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c > @@ -202,10 +202,10 @@ static void cmsdk_apb_watchdog_write(void *opaque, > hwaddr offset, > */ > ptimer_transaction_begin(s->timer); > ptimer_set_limit(s->timer, value, 1); > - ptimer_run(s->timer, 0); > ptimer_transaction_commit(s->timer); > break; This looks like a correct change, but the comment just above here needs to be updated to match it (it currently says "and make sure we're counting"). Otherwise this change looks good. -- PMM