On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 15:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Plus this scheme is basically just better - it won't force > > all the functions of a multi-function device to share an interrupt. > > Only if some functions use pin != INTA. Maybe it's true for > pseries? On the pc most of them use INTA.
Ah ? Most device I've seen with secondary functions use a different pin... (not to be confused with PC chipset built-in devices that is, but we aren't emulating any of these here anyway). Cheers, Ben.
