On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 05:01:38PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:01:07 -0700
> Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 08 Oct 2024, nifan....@gmail.com wrote:\n
> > >From: Fan Ni <fan...@samsung.com>
> > >
> > >In the function cmd_firmware_update_get_info for handling Get FW info
> > >command (0x0200h), the vmem, pmem and DC capacity size check were
> > >incorrect. The size should be aligned to 256MiB, not smaller than
> > >256MiB.  
> > 
> > Can get rid of a level of parenthesis (other cmds as well), otherwise:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net>
> I missed this one when gathering up fixes the other day.
> I'll queue it up now with the excess brackets dropped.
> 
> Jonathan
Thanks Jonathan,
Please also take a look the following patch, it is a fix for dcd.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20241015190224.251293-1-nifan....@gmail.com/T/#u

Fan

> 
> > 
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Fan Ni <fan...@samsung.com>
> > >---
> > > hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > >index 9258e48f95..c82ad50ac8 100644
> > >--- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > >+++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > >@@ -649,9 +649,9 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_firmware_update_get_info(const 
> > >struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> > >     } QEMU_PACKED *fw_info;
> > >     QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*fw_info) != 0x50);
> > >
> > >-    if ((cxl_dstate->vmem_size < CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER) ||
> > >-        (cxl_dstate->pmem_size < CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER) ||
> > >-        (ct3d->dc.total_capacity < CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER)) {
> > >+    if ((!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(cxl_dstate->vmem_size, 
> > >CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER)) ||
> > >+        (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(cxl_dstate->pmem_size, 
> > >CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER)) ||
> > >+        (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(ct3d->dc.total_capacity, 
> > >CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER))) {
> > >         return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> > >     }
> > >
> > >--
> > >2.43.0
> > >  
> 

-- 
Fan Ni

Reply via email to