On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 13:01, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > On 04/12/2012 06:57 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >> So, the darwin-user/ subdirectory is officially Orphan, and looking >> at the git history the last commit to it which wasn't either "apply >> a global change", "fix cppcheck/spelling error/similar autodetected >> nit" or "duplicate a linux-user fix into darwin-user and bsd-user" >> was way back in 2009, perhaps even earlier. >> >> If in three years nobody's cared enough about it to manage to get >> a single darwin-user specific change into the tree, my suggestion >> would be that it is in practice dead and we should make that >> official by deleting it. Then we can stop wasting effort on applying >> (untested!) global changes to these files. > > > Acked-by: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
I'm fine with this too. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > >> >> Does anybody want to argue against that idea? >> >> (This came up on IRC a month or so ago, and there seemed to be >> a consensus that the use case it was originally intended for >> (x86 darwin binaries on ppc or vice versa? I forget) was now >> no longer interesting to anybody. I don't have a strong opinion >> personally but I thought I'd bring the idea up formally here.) >> >> -- PMM >> > >
