On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 15:32, Román Cárdenas Rodríguez <rcardenas....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks like the stm32l4x5 is quite similar to my implementation. It didn’t > exist when I started with my implementation . I will take a closer look and > work on improving/extending the stm32l4x5 GPIO with my proposal. Is it OK if > I rename it to stm32_gpio? so it is clearer that the implementation is > generic and can fit almost any STM32 target.
Yes, renaming would be OK. (Do that in a patch of its own that does the rename and nothing else.) > Sorry about the issues with the patches, I am not familiar with this > methodology of working with git. > Could you guide me on how to send with you a revised version of patches 3 and > 4? So I've taken your patches 1 and 2 into my git tree; they will appear upstream probably either end of this week or beginning of next week. If that happens before you're ready to send out a version 2 of this series, you can rebase your patches on head-of-git and then send out a new series with patches 3 and 4 in it. If you're ready to send v2 before the other patches land in upstream git, just send out v2 with the whole 4-patch set in it. thanks -- PMM
