On Thu Sep 19, 2024 at 2:50 AM AEST, Chalapathi V wrote:
> From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <phi...@linaro.org>
>
> It is unfair to let the PowerNV SPI model to the SSI
> maintainers. Also include the PowerNV ones.
>
> Fixes: 29318db133 ("hw/ssi: Add SPI model")
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chalapathi V <chalapath...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index ffacd60f40..b11c4edaf0 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1541,8 +1541,10 @@ F: hw/ppc/pnv*
>  F: hw/intc/pnv*
>  F: hw/intc/xics_pnv.c
>  F: hw/pci-host/pnv*
> +F: hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c
>  F: include/hw/ppc/pnv*
>  F: include/hw/pci-host/pnv*
> +F: hw/ssi/pnv_spi*
Should be include/hw/ssi/pnv_spi*

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>

>  F: pc-bios/skiboot.lid
>  F: tests/qtest/pnv*
>  F: tests/functional/test_ppc64_powernv.py


Reply via email to