On Thu Sep 19, 2024 at 2:50 AM AEST, Chalapathi V wrote: > From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <phi...@linaro.org> > > It is unfair to let the PowerNV SPI model to the SSI > maintainers. Also include the PowerNV ones. > > Fixes: 29318db133 ("hw/ssi: Add SPI model") > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Chalapathi V <chalapath...@linux.ibm.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index ffacd60f40..b11c4edaf0 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1541,8 +1541,10 @@ F: hw/ppc/pnv* > F: hw/intc/pnv* > F: hw/intc/xics_pnv.c > F: hw/pci-host/pnv* > +F: hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c > F: include/hw/ppc/pnv* > F: include/hw/pci-host/pnv* > +F: hw/ssi/pnv_spi*
Should be include/hw/ssi/pnv_spi* Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> > F: pc-bios/skiboot.lid > F: tests/qtest/pnv* > F: tests/functional/test_ppc64_powernv.py