Hi Chuang.
Look fine for me, and only some minor nits:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 04:13:44PM +0800, Chuang Xu wrote:
> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:13:44 +0800
> From: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxc...@bytedance.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical
> processors in the physical package
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)
>
> When QEMU is started with:
> -cpu host,migratable=on,host-cache-info=on,l3-cache=off
> -smp 180,sockets=2,dies=1,cores=45,threads=2
>
> Try to execute "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in guest, we'll obtain a value of 90 for
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], while the expected value is 128. And Try to
> execute "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in guest, we'll obtain a value of 63 for
> CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26] as expected.
I polished the sentences a bit:
When executing "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in the guest, we obtain a value of 90 for
CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], whereas the expected value is 128. Additionally,
executing "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in the guest yields a value of 63 for
CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26], which matches the expected result.
> As (1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) round up to the nearest power-of-2 integer,
s/round/rounds/
> we'd beter round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2
> integer too. Otherwise we may encounter unexpected results in guest.
>
> For example, when QEMU is started with CLI above and xtopology is disabled,
What's xtopology?
> guest kernel 5.15.120 uses CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16]/(1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) to
> calculate threads-per-core in detect_ht(). Then guest will get "90/(1+63)=1"
> as the result, even though theads-per-core should actually be 2.
s/theads-per-core/threads-per-core/
> So let us round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2 integer
> to solve the unexpected result.
>
> In addition, we introduce max_thread_number_in_package() instead of
> using pow2ceil() to be compatible with smp and hybrid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guixiong Wei <weiguixi...@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyip...@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxc...@bytedance.com>
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 85ef7452c0..1b4e3b6931 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,12 @@ static uint32_t max_thread_ids_for_cache(X86CPUTopoInfo
> *topo_info,
> return num_ids - 1;
> }
>
> +static uint32_t max_thread_number_in_package(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
> +{
> + uint32_t num_threads = 1 << apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info);
> + return num_threads;
> +}
> +
> static uint32_t max_core_ids_in_package(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
> {
> uint32_t num_cores = 1 << (apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info) -
> @@ -6462,7 +6468,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index,
> uint32_t count,
> }
> *edx = env->features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> if (threads_per_pkg > 1) {
> - *ebx |= threads_per_pkg << 16;
> + *ebx |= max_thread_number_in_package(&topo_info) << 16;
This helper has only 1 caller and its name doesn't distinguish the
addressable ID, so it's not necessary. I feel it's better to shift
the bits directly here:
*ebx |= 1 << apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info) << 16;
> *edx |= CPUID_HT;
> }
> if (!cpu->enable_pmu) {
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1....@intel.com>
