Gao Shiyuan via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:

> As shown below, if a virtio PCI device is attached under a pci-bridge, the MR
> of VirtIOPCIRegion does not belong to any address space. So memory_region_find
> cannot be used to search for this MR.
>
> Introduce the virtio-pci and pci_bridge_pci address spaces to solve this 
> problem.
>
> Before:
> memory-region: pci_bridge_pci
>   0000000000000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, i/o): pci_bridge_pci
>     00000000fe200000-00000000fe200fff (prio 1, i/o): virtio-blk-pci-msix
>       00000000fe200000-00000000fe20016f (prio 0, i/o): msix-table
>       00000000fe200800-00000000fe200807 (prio 0, i/o): msix-pba
>     000000a000400000-000000a000403fff (prio 1, i/o): virtio-pci
>       000000a000400000-000000a000400fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-common-virtio-blk
>       000000a000401000-000000a000401fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-isr-virtio-blk
>       000000a000402000-000000a000402fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-device-virtio-blk
>       000000a000403000-000000a000403fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-notify-virtio-blk
>
> After:
> address-space: pci_bridge_pci
>   0000000000000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, i/o): pci_bridge_pci
>     00000000fe200000-00000000fe200fff (prio 1, i/o): virtio-blk-pci-msix
>       00000000fe200000-00000000fe20016f (prio 0, i/o): msix-table
>       00000000fe200800-00000000fe200807 (prio 0, i/o): msix-pba
>     000000a000400000-000000a000403fff (prio 1, i/o): virtio-pci
>       000000a000400000-000000a000400fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-common-virtio-blk
>       000000a000401000-000000a000401fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-isr-virtio-blk
>       000000a000402000-000000a000402fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-device-virtio-blk
>       000000a000403000-000000a000403fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-notify-virtio-blk
>
> address-space: virtio-pci
>   000000a000400000-000000a000403fff (prio 1, i/o): virtio-pci
>     000000a000400000-000000a000400fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-common-virtio-blk
>     000000a000401000-000000a000401fff (prio 0, i/o): virtio-pci-isr-virtio-blk
>     000000a000402000-000000a000402fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-device-virtio-blk
>     000000a000403000-000000a000403fff (prio 0, i/o): 
> virtio-pci-notify-virtio-blk
>
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2576
> Fixes: ffa8a3e ("virtio-pci: Add lookup subregion of VirtIOPCIRegion MR")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Shiyuan <gaoshiy...@baidu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zuo Boqun <zuobo...@baidu.com>
> ---
>  hw/pci/pci_bridge.c            | 2 ++
>  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c         | 3 +++
>  include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h    | 1 +
>  include/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h | 1 +
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> index 6a4e38856d..74683e7445 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> @@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ void pci_bridge_initfn(PCIDevice *dev, const char 
> *typename)
>      sec_bus->map_irq = br->map_irq ? br->map_irq : pci_swizzle_map_irq_fn;
>      sec_bus->address_space_mem = &br->address_space_mem;
>      memory_region_init(&br->address_space_mem, OBJECT(br), "pci_bridge_pci", 
> UINT64_MAX);
> +    address_space_init(&br->as_mem, &br->address_space_mem, 
> "pci_bridge_pci");

I don't think this "pci_bridge_pci" address space is necessary. The
VirtIOPCIProxy.modern_as AddressSpace is sufficient for
memory_region_add() to work.

>      sec_bus->address_space_io = &br->address_space_io;
>      memory_region_init(&br->address_space_io, OBJECT(br), "pci_bridge_io",
>                         4 * GiB);
> @@ -399,6 +400,7 @@ void pci_bridge_exitfn(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>      PCIBridge *s = PCI_BRIDGE(pci_dev);
>      assert(QLIST_EMPTY(&s->sec_bus.child));
>      QLIST_REMOVE(&s->sec_bus, sibling);
> +    address_space_destroy(&s->as_mem);
>      pci_bridge_region_del(s, &s->windows);
>      pci_bridge_region_cleanup(s, &s->windows);
>      /* object_unparent() is called automatically during device deletion */
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index 4d832fe845..502b9751dc 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -2180,6 +2180,8 @@ static void virtio_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, 
> Error **errp)
>                         /* PCI BAR regions must be powers of 2 */
>                         pow2ceil(proxy->notify.offset + proxy->notify.size));
>
> +    address_space_init(&proxy->modern_as, &proxy->modern_bar, "virtio-pci");

Can we add some suffix to the address space name so that we can tell
them apart when there are multiple virtio devices created?

> +
>      if (proxy->disable_legacy == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) {
>          proxy->disable_legacy = pcie_port ? ON_OFF_AUTO_ON : ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
>      }
> @@ -2275,6 +2277,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_exit(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>          pci_is_express(pci_dev)) {
>          pcie_aer_exit(pci_dev);
>      }
> +    address_space_destroy(&proxy->modern_as);
>  }
>
>  static void virtio_pci_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> index 5cd452115a..2e807760e4 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct PCIBridge {
>       */
>      MemoryRegion address_space_mem;
>      MemoryRegion address_space_io;
> +    AddressSpace as_mem;
>
>      PCIBridgeWindows windows;
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> index 9e67ba38c7..fddceaaa47 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ struct VirtIOPCIProxy {
>      };
>      MemoryRegion modern_bar;
>      MemoryRegion io_bar;
> +    AddressSpace modern_as;

How about naming it "config_as" or "config_mem_as"? While the PCI
configuration access capability is specific to modern devices, what it
maps (and only maps) are the virtio config regions.

Also, we may need another "config_io_as" for the port I/O mapped
notification config region.

>      uint32_t legacy_io_bar_idx;
>      uint32_t msix_bar_idx;
>      uint32_t modern_io_bar_idx;

--
Best Regards
Junjie Mao

Reply via email to