Quoting Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com): > On 2012-04-09 17:36, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Hi, > > > > at https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/975240 there is > > reported a problem in 1.0.0 with running unaccelerated qemu with hpet. > > This is fixed upstream as of commit > > ce967e2f33861b0e17753f97fa4527b5943c94b6. > > However, that one seems very depending on many of the preceding ~thousand > > commits. > > > > On irc mjt and iggy suggested that implicitly setting -no-hpet when tcg > > is chosen should be fine. Right now that seems the best course, but > > does anyone know how one would cleanly cherrypick that commit into 1.0? > > Does anyone see a reason why -no-hpet with -no-kvm would cause anyone > > trouble? > > Have you already tried to backport the complete set or dependent > patches, ie. 5904ae4eba..ce967e2f33?
Yes, I did, starting with that range. But I kept finding more patches that seemed to need to preceed it ( cf88a3bcc442d70e10d3969e1edfc8430d74172f, (40c9dcbfd026f0d0dd73dcf5a189ead7d1ba2d0f, 48a18b3c698295e4d891f34e919615e84e20f027, ad6d45fa0837acf3e8cab323ee5b08e05a9410a5). Perhaps the original set should have been easy to port to 1.0, and I just didn't know what I was doing, but there seemed to constantly be more previous changes needed. thanks, -serge
