On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 13:04, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 12:56, Nico Boehr <n...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Quoting Peter Maydell (2024-08-30 12:01:47) > > > I ran overnight with none of the patchset applied, and it never > > > failed (as expected). Running with just the first virtio-ccw > > > patch does fall over fairly quickly. So something's up with > > > that patch, which is curious because that's the one I thought > > > was a straightforward conversion without any complications :-) > > > > > > I'll investigate further today, I have the beginnings of a > > > theory about what might be happening... > > > > Thanks for taking the time, Peter! Let me know when you have insights. > > I think I've found the problem, I'm just testing it to see if it > does properly fix the intermittent.
> The fix is to add an extra patch at the start of the > series. Once I've tested this I'll send out a v2 of the series, > maybe also adding the cleanup RTH suggested in one of the later > patches. By the way, how would you like this series to go upstream? I can think of three options: * you take the whole thing through the s390 tree * I take the whole thing through my tree * you take the s390 specific patches, and I take the remaining reset-cleanup patches once those have landed Any preference? thanks -- PMM
