On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 12:53:19PM GMT, 陆知行 wrote:
Hi, can someone review this patch?
I find requests which call vhost_user_get_u64 does not set NEED_REPLY flag
Can you provide an example to trigger this issue?
Also, with this change all calls to vhost_user_get_u64() will set that
flag, is that following the vhost-user user specification?
Please use `scripts/checkpatch.pl` before sending patches, this one for
example is missing SoB.
Thanks,
Stefano
luzhixing12345 <luzhixing12...@gmail.com> 于2024年8月4日周日 23:50写道:
Front-end message requests which need reply should set NEED_REPLY_MASK
in flag, and response from slave need clear NEED_REPLY_MASK flag.
---
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 2 +-
subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
index 00561daa06..edf2271e0a 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ static int vhost_user_get_u64(struct vhost_dev *dev,
int request, uint64_t *u64)
int ret;
VhostUserMsg msg = {
.hdr.request = request,
- .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION,
+ .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION | VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK,
};
if (vhost_user_per_device_request(request) && dev->vq_index != 0) {
diff --git a/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
b/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
index 9c630c2170..40f665bd7f 100644
--- a/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
+++ b/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
@@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ vu_send_reply(VuDev *dev, int conn_fd, VhostUserMsg
*vmsg)
{
/* Set the version in the flags when sending the reply */
vmsg->flags &= ~VHOST_USER_VERSION_MASK;
+ vmsg->flags &= ~VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK;
vmsg->flags |= VHOST_USER_VERSION;
vmsg->flags |= VHOST_USER_REPLY_MASK;
--
2.34.1