Hi Phil,

On 10/12/23 9:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
There are no root function properties exposed by the host
bridge, so using a 2-step QOM creation isn't really useful.

Simplify by creating the root function when the host bridge
is realized.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
---
  hw/pci-host/designware.c | 15 ++++-----------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci-host/designware.c b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
index 304eca1b5c..692e0731cd 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/designware.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
@@ -707,6 +707,10 @@ static void designware_pcie_host_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
Error **errp)
                         "pcie-bus-address-space");
      pci_setup_iommu(pci->bus, designware_pcie_host_set_iommu, s);
+ object_initialize_child(OBJECT(dev), "root", &s->root,
+                            TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT);
+    qdev_prop_set_int32(DEVICE(&s->root), "addr", PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
+    qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(&s->root), "multifunction", false);
      qdev_realize(DEVICE(&s->root), BUS(pci->bus), &error_fatal);
  }
@@ -736,22 +740,11 @@ static void designware_pcie_host_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
      dc->vmsd = &vmstate_designware_pcie_host;
  }
-static void designware_pcie_host_init(Object *obj)
-{
-    DesignwarePCIEHost *s = DESIGNWARE_PCIE_HOST(obj);
-    DesignwarePCIERoot *root = &s->root;
-
-    object_initialize_child(obj, "root", root, TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT);
-    qdev_prop_set_int32(DEVICE(root), "addr", PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
-    qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(root), "multifunction", false);
-}
-
  static const TypeInfo designware_pcie_types[] = {
      {
          .name           = TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_HOST,
          .parent         = TYPE_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE,
          .instance_size  = sizeof(DesignwarePCIEHost),
-        .instance_init  = designware_pcie_host_init,
          .class_init     = designware_pcie_host_class_init,
      }, {
          .name           = TYPE_DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ROOT,


I could not find any mention in the docs recommending the use of
init/realize pair only when properties could be consumed. Anyways,
you agreed with Peter's comment (I agree too), so I understand this
patch will be drop since it doesn't affect the other patches in the
series.


Cheers,
Gustavo

Reply via email to