On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 05:12:32PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Could be a good idea. Although I'm not sure what to do with > all types, maybe we can restrict what is supported. > > > Is this wider re-factoring something that can wait for the next > > developer cycle? > > I would say so. It's not quite trivial to do nicely since > things are a bit tangled between util/async and replay. > > > >> I had started on a conversion once but not completed it. > > >> I could resurrect if there is agreement on the API? > > > > I would certainly welcome it being cleaned up. The supported replay > > devices are very piecemeal at the moment. > > I'll tidy up and post an RFC for how the new API might look. > > Thanks, > Nick
Fundamentally it's virtio net, up to Jason. I don't like messy APIs and people tend to get distracted and not fix them up if one does not make this a blocker. -- MST
