Il 05/04/2012 14:53, malc ha scritto: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> Il 05/04/2012 14:30, malc ha scritto: >>>>> Would save that "* 1000". I just wondered why we do not use it elsewhere >>>>> in QEMU and was reluctant to risk some BSD breakage. >>>>> >>> It's probably worth mentioning that using anything other than >>> clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONING (as well as setting proper pthread >>> clock attr on the condition variable) is prone to the surprises (such >>> as NTP corrections and daylight saving changes). >> >> I was about to suggest the same, but how widespread is support for >> pthread_condattr_setclock? > > If it's not all is lost anyway.
Only once every year. :) Paolo
