Il 03/04/2012 10:38, Lai Jiangshan ha scritto:
> runnable coroutine queue is the core mangement of the coroutine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> qemu-coroutine-lock.c | 27 ---------------------------
> qemu-coroutine.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> qemu-coroutine.h | 7 +++++++
> trace-events | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-coroutine-lock.c b/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
> index 6f47685..159d66d 100644
> --- a/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
> +++ b/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
> @@ -26,35 +26,8 @@
> #include "qemu-coroutine.h"
> #include "qemu-coroutine-int.h"
> #include "qemu-queue.h"
> -#include "main-loop.h"
> #include "trace.h"
>
> -static QTAILQ_HEAD(, Coroutine) co_runnable_queue =
> - QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(co_runnable_queue);
> -static QEMUBH* co_runnable_bh;
> -
> -static void qemu_co_process_runnable(void *opaque)
> -{
> - Coroutine *next;
> -
> - trace_qemu_co_process_runnable();
> - while ((next = QTAILQ_FIRST(&co_runnable_queue))) {
> - QTAILQ_REMOVE(&co_runnable_queue, next, co_queue_next);
> - qemu_coroutine_enter(next, NULL);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -static void qemu_co_runnable_schedule(Coroutine *co)
> -{
> - QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&co_runnable_queue, co, co_queue_next);
> - qemu_bh_schedule(co_runnable_bh);
> -}
> -
> -static void __attribute__((constructor)) co_runnable_bh_init(void)
> -{
> - co_runnable_bh = qemu_bh_new(qemu_co_process_runnable, NULL);
> -}
> -
> void qemu_co_queue_init(CoQueue *queue)
> {
> QTAILQ_INIT(&queue->entries);
> diff --git a/qemu-coroutine.c b/qemu-coroutine.c
> index c01252e..c67d557 100644
> --- a/qemu-coroutine.c
> +++ b/qemu-coroutine.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,33 @@
> #include "qemu-common.h"
> #include "qemu-coroutine.h"
> #include "qemu-coroutine-int.h"
> +#include "main-loop.h"
> +
> +static QTAILQ_HEAD(, Coroutine) co_runnable_queue =
> + QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(co_runnable_queue);
> +static QEMUBH* co_runnable_bh;
> +
> +static void qemu_co_process_runnable(void *opaque)
> +{
> + Coroutine *next;
> +
> + trace_qemu_co_process_runnable();
> + while ((next = QTAILQ_FIRST(&co_runnable_queue))) {
> + QTAILQ_REMOVE(&co_runnable_queue, next, co_queue_next);
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(next, NULL);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void qemu_co_runnable_schedule(Coroutine *co)
> +{
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&co_runnable_queue, co, co_queue_next);
> + qemu_bh_schedule(co_runnable_bh);
> +}
> +
> +static void __attribute__((constructor)) co_runnable_bh_init(void)
> +{
> + co_runnable_bh = qemu_bh_new(qemu_co_process_runnable, NULL);
> +}
>
> Coroutine *qemu_coroutine_create(CoroutineEntry *entry)
> {
> diff --git a/qemu-coroutine.h b/qemu-coroutine.h
> index 34c15d4..82a7e5c 100644
> --- a/qemu-coroutine.h
> +++ b/qemu-coroutine.h
> @@ -82,6 +82,13 @@ void qemu_coroutine_enter(Coroutine *coroutine, void
> *opaque);
> void coroutine_fn qemu_coroutine_yield(void);
>
> /**
> + * Add a coroutine to runnable to runnable queue
> + *
> + * The coroutine will be processed later.
> + */
> +void qemu_co_runnable_schedule(Coroutine *co);
> +
> +/**
> * Get the currently executing coroutine
> */
> Coroutine *coroutine_fn qemu_coroutine_self(void);
> diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
> index a1737c2..39b9c84 100644
> --- a/trace-events
> +++ b/trace-events
> @@ -556,12 +556,12 @@ qemu_put_ram_ptr(void* addr) "%p"
> xen_platform_log(char *s) "xen platform: %s"
>
> # qemu-coroutine.c
> +qemu_co_process_runnable(void) ""
> qemu_coroutine_enter(void *from, void *to, void *opaque) "from %p to %p
> opaque %p"
> qemu_coroutine_yield(void *from, void *to) "from %p to %p"
> qemu_coroutine_terminate(void *co) "self %p"
>
> # qemu-coroutine-lock.c
> -qemu_co_process_runnable(void) ""
> qemu_co_queue_next(void *next) "next %p"
> qemu_co_mutex_lock_entry(void *mutex, void *self) "mutex %p self %p"
> qemu_co_mutex_lock_return(void *mutex, void *self) "mutex %p self %p"
I think the point here was to have qemu-coroutine.c not depend on the
QEMU main loop, so this is not ok.
Paolo
