On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 at 01:11, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > So it's not a rw lock. It's just a mutex. > Lock should be named after what they protect, not > after where they are held. > In this case, this ensures only 1 request is > outstanding at a time. > So vhost_user_request_reply_lock
Okay, will do this change. Thank you. --- - Prasad
