Il 30/03/2012 12:25, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Il 30/03/2012 09:19, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>>>>> +void block_job_cancel_sync(BlockJob *job)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + BlockDriverState *bs = job->bs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + assert(bs->job == job);
>>>>> + block_job_cancel(job);
>>>>> + while (bs->job != NULL && bs->job->busy) {
>>> It's not clear to me why we have a busy flag.
>>
>> Because the coroutine does not restart if you do qemu_aio_wait and the
>> coroutine is waiting in co_sleep. So the busy flag communicates that
>> the coroutine is quiescent and, when cancelled, will not issue any new I/O.
>
> Ah, yes. This is tricky, a comment would be nice.
I'll just add gtkdoc comments for the blockjob interface. We need to
start somewhere...
Paolo
