Hi Vishnu, > From: Vishnu Pajjuri <vis...@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 10:53 AM > To: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; > qemu-...@nongnu.org; m...@redhat.com > > Hi Salil, > On 14-06-2024 05:06, Salil Mehta wrote: > PROLOGUE > ======== > > To assist in review and set the right expectations from this RFC, please first > read the sections *APPENDED AT THE END* of this cover letter: > > 1. Important *DISCLAIMER* [Section (X)] > 2. Work presented at KVMForum Conference (slides available) [Section (V)F] > 3. Organization of patches [Section (XI)] > 4. References [Section (XII)] > 5. Detailed TODO list of leftover work or work-in-progress [Section (IX)] > > There has been interest shown by other organizations in adapting this series > for their architecture. Hence, RFC V2 [21] has been split into architecture > *agnostic* [22] and *specific* patch sets. > > This is an ARM architecture-specific patch set carved out of RFC V2. Please > check section (XI)B for details of architecture agnostic patches. > > SECTIONS [I - XIII] are as follows: > > (I) Key Changes [details in last section (XIV)] > ============================================== > > RFC V2 -> RFC V3 > > 1. Split into Architecture *agnostic* (V13) [22] and *specific* (RFC V3) > patch sets. > 2. Addressed comments by Gavin Shan (RedHat), Shaoqin Huang (RedHat), > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (Linaro), > > Jonathan Cameron (Huawei), Zhao Liu (Intel). > I tried following test cases with rfc-v3 and kernel patches v10, and it's > looking good on Ampere platforms. > • Regular hotplug and hot unplug tests > • Live migration with and with out hot-plugging vcpus tests > Please feel free to add, > Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri mailto:vis...@os.amperecomputing.com
Many thanks for testing and confirming the functionality. Really appreciate this! Best Salil. > > Regards, > -Vishnu. > > RFC V1 -> RFC V2 >
