John Snow <js...@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024, 8:49 AM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> John Snow <js...@redhat.com> writes:
[...] >> > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/doc-interleaved-section.json >> > b/tests/qapi-schema/doc-interleaved-section.json >> > index adb29e98daa..b26bc0bbb79 100644 >> > --- a/tests/qapi-schema/doc-interleaved-section.json >> > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/doc-interleaved-section.json >> > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ >> > # >> > # bao >> > # >> > -# Note: a section. >> > +# Returns: a section. >> > # >> > # @foobar: catch this >> > # >> >> "Returns:" is only valid for commands, and this is a struct. Let's use >> "TODO:" instead. >> > > Weird that it didn't prohibit it. Bug? No: it simply chokes on "description of '@foobar:' follows a section" before it can choke on "'Returns' section is only valid for commands".
