Am 27.03.2012 19:24, schrieb Blue Swirl: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:56, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> wrote: >> [...] While the MAINTAINER host support >> sections do not list me (they're still new in there), Solaris patches >> have traditionally gone through me, so that is not a particular reaction >> to the contents of form of Lee's patches, I am serious. > > I'm a bit surprised about this claim, I think I haven't been aware of > this route. When did Solaris patches go through you, could you name > some?
Just stumbled over this branch with e88131d2177cf12dba99c13fe5ff6a21d8fb7dc1 from Sep 19, 2010 at its head: http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/shortlog/refs/heads/solaris Guess whom it was committed by? http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu.git/commit/e78815a554adaa551d62a71be10ee2fcf128e473 As you can see, the more recent C99 patch - which Avi offered to write in response to my(!) report - is not in there, since this branch is still from my old OpenSolaris machine that I screwed up during an attempted migration to OpenIndiana. But like I said elsewhere, further patches are not strictly needed when building without guest agent and tracing and running in a bash environment, thus no need for tons of patches for a working platform. So had you wanted to, it would've been really easy to find evidence that I was the last one around here working on Solaris/illumos support. Andreas
