Il gio 13 giu 2024, 09:13 Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 11:27:04PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Il mer 12 giu 2024, 22:58 Manos Pitsidianakis < > > manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org> ha scritto: > > > > > In any case, it is out of scope for this RFC. Introducing wrappers > would > > > be a gradual process. > > > > > > > Sure, how would you feel about such bindings being developed on list, and > > maintained in a (somewhat) long-lived experimental branch? > > IMHO any higher level binding APIs for Rust should be acceptable in the > main QEMU tree as soon as we accept Rust functionality. They can evolve > in-tree based on the needs of whomever is creating and/or consuming them. > My question is the opposite, should we accept Rust functionality without proper high level bindings? I am afraid that, if more Rust devices are contributed, it becomes technical debt to have a mix of idiomatic and C-ish code. If the answer is no, then this PL011 device has to be developed out of tree. Paolo > > With regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- > https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- > https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- > https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| > >
