On Mon, Jun 03 2024, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gu...@amd.com>
>
> Also brings in an linux-headers/linux/vhost.h fix from v6.9-rc4.
>
> Co-developed-by: Michael Roth <michael.r...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.r...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gu...@amd.com>
> Message-ID: <20240530111643.1091816-3-pankaj.gu...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> ---
> linux-headers/asm-loongarch/kvm.h | 4 +++
> linux-headers/asm-riscv/kvm.h | 1 +
> linux-headers/asm-x86/kvm.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> linux-headers/linux/vhost.h | 15 ++++-----
> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Hm, I'm not sure updating to kvm/next is a good idea ("current kvm/next"
does not mean anything without a commit hash anyway.) I think we should
only update to something that's in Linus' tree already... how stable is
kvm/next?
