On 2012-03-26 21:39, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 03/26/2012 02:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>>> Since this is an easily refactorable thing to look at later, I think >>>>> we should >>>>> start with extracting the types. >>>> >>>> My worry is that those three refactorings set bad examples for others. >>>> So I'd like to avoid such back and forth if possible. >>> >>> I'm not really worried about it. It's so easier to refactor this >>> later. Why rush it now? >> >> You rush changing the current layout, not me. :) > > No, I'm trying to do incremental changes without boiling the ocean in > the process. > > I think we all are in violent agreement about where we want to end up > (as opaque types as possible). I don't want to hold back additional > refactoring on doing this right (and it's not just a matter of > malloc/free).
Either I'm missing it in the code shuffling, or it's not part of this series: Can you point out where more that a forward reference and malloc/free is needed? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
