Hi Cédric,
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 3:52 PM
>To: Duan, Zhenzhong <zhenzhong.d...@intel.com>; qemu-
>de...@nongnu.org
>Cc: alex.william...@redhat.com; eric.au...@redhat.com; Peng, Chao P
><chao.p.p...@intel.com>; Eric Farman <far...@linux.ibm.com>; Matthew
>Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com>; Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>;
>open list:vfio-ccw <qemu-s3...@nongnu.org>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/20] vfio/ccw: Fix the missed unrealize() call in
>error path
>
>On 5/22/24 06:40, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> When get name failed, we should call unrealize() so that
>> vfio_ccw_realize() is self contained.
>>
>> Fixes: 909a6254eda ("vfio/ccw: Make vfio cdev pre-openable by passing a
>file handle")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.d...@intel.com>
>
>If the realize handler fails, the unrealize handler should be called.
>See device_set_realized(). We should be fine without IMO.
Do you mean when vfio_ccw_realize() fails, vfio_ccw_unrealize() will be called?
Looked into device_set_realized(), I didn't see where vfio_ccw_unrealize() was
called.
Do I misunderstand?
Thanks
Zhenzhong
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>C.
>
>
>
>> ---
>> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
>> index 168c9e5973..161704cd7b 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
>> @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_realize(DeviceState *dev,
>Error **errp)
>> }
>>
>> if (!vfio_device_get_name(vbasedev, errp)) {
>> - return;
>> + goto out_unrealize;
>> }
>>
>> if (!vfio_attach_device(cdev->mdevid, vbasedev,
>> @@ -633,6 +633,7 @@ out_region_err:
>> vfio_detach_device(vbasedev);
>> out_attach_dev_err:
>> g_free(vbasedev->name);
>> +out_unrealize:
>> if (cdc->unrealize) {
>> cdc->unrealize(cdev);
>> }
