Hi Salil,

On 5/16/24 17:42, Salil Mehta wrote:
Hi Harsh,

  From: Harsh Prateek Bora <hars...@linux.ibm.com>
  Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 11:15 AM
Hi Salil, Thanks for your email.
  Your patch 1/8 is included here based on review comments on my previous
  patch from one of the maintainers in the community and therefore I had
  kept you in CC to be aware of the desire of having this independent patch to
  get merged earlier even if your other patches in the series may go through
  further reviews.

I really don’t know which discussion are  you pointing at? Please understand
you are fixing a bug and we are pushing a feature which has got large series.
It will break the patch-set  which is about t be merged.

There will be significant overhead of testing on us for the work we have been
carrying forward for large time. This will be disruptive. Please dont!


I was referring to the review discussion on my prev patch here:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/d191d2jfar7l.2eh4s445m4...@gmail.com/

Although your patch was included with this series only to facilitate
review of the additional patches depending on just one of your patch.

I am not sure what is appearing disruptive here. It is a common practive
in the community that maintainer(s) can pick individual patches from the
series if it has been vetted by siginificant number of reviewers.

However, in this case, since you have mentioned to post next version
soon, you need not worry about it as that would be the preferred version
for both of the series.


I am hoping to see your v9 soon and thereafter maintainer(s) may choose to
  pick the latest independent patch if needs to be merged earlier.


I don’t think you are understanding what problem it is causing. For your
small bug fix you are causing significant delays at our end.


I hope I clarfied above that including your patch here doesnt delay
anything. Hoping to see your v9 soon!

Thanks
Harsh

Thanks
Salil.
Thanks for your work and let's be hopeful it gets merged soon. regards,
  Harsh
On 5/16/24 14:00, Salil Mehta wrote:
  > Hi Harsh,
  >
  > Thanks for your interest in the patch-set but taking away patches like
  > this from other series without any discussion can disrupt others work
  > and its acceptance on time. This is because we will have to put lot of
  > effort in rebasing bigger series and then testing overhead comes along
  > with it.
  >
  > The patch-set (from where this  patch has been taken) is part of even
  > bigger series and there have been many people and companies toiling to
  > fix the bugs collectively in that series and for years.
  >
  > I'm about float the V9 version of the Arch agnostic series which this
  > patch is part of and you can rebase your patch-set from there. I'm
  > hopeful that it will get accepted in this cycle.
  >
  >
  > Many thanks
  > Salil.
  >
  >>   From: Harsh Prateek Bora <hars...@linux.ibm.com>
  >>   Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 6:32 AM
  >>
  >>   From: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>
  >>
  >>   KVM vCPU creation is done once during the vCPU realization when
  Qemu
  >>   vCPU thread is spawned. This is common to all the architectures as of
  now.
  >>
  >>   Hot-unplug of vCPU results in destruction of the vCPU object in QOM
  but
  >>   the corresponding KVM vCPU object in the Host KVM is not destroyed
  as
  >>   KVM doesn't support vCPU removal. Therefore, its representative KVM
  >>   vCPU object/context in Qemu is parked.
  >>
  >>   Refactor architecture common logic so that some APIs could be reused
  by
  >>   vCPU Hotplug code of some architectures likes ARM, Loongson etc.
  Update
  >>   new/old APIs with trace events instead of DPRINTF. No functional
  change is
  >>   intended here.
  >>
  >>   Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>
  >>   Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gs...@redhat.com>
  >>   Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vis...@os.amperecomputing.com>
  >>   Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
  >>   Tested-by: Xianglai Li <lixiang...@loongson.cn>
  >>   Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.l...@oracle.com>
  >>   Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahu...@redhat.com>
  >>   [harshpb: fixed rebase failures in include/sysemu/kvm.h]
  >>   Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <hars...@linux.ibm.com>
  >>   ---
  >>    include/sysemu/kvm.h   | 15 ++++++++++
  >>    accel/kvm/kvm-all.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  -----
  >>   --
  >>    accel/kvm/trace-events |  5 +++-
  >>    3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
  >>
  >>   diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h index
  >>   eaf801bc93..fa3ec74442 100644
  >>   --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
  >>   +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
  >>   @@ -434,6 +434,21 @@ void kvm_set_sigmask_len(KVMState *s,
  unsigned
  >>   int sigmask_len);
  >>
  >>    int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void
  >>   *ram_addr,
  >>                                           hwaddr *phys_addr);
  >>   +/**
  >>   + * kvm_create_vcpu - Gets a parked KVM vCPU or creates a KVM
  vCPU
  >>   + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which KVM vCPU has to be
  >>   fetched/created.
  >>   + *
  >>   + * @returns: 0 when success, errno (<0) when failed.
  >>   + */
  >>   +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
  >>   +
  >>   +/**
  >>   + * kvm_park_vcpu - Park QEMU KVM vCPU context
  >>   + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which QEMU KVM vCPU context
  has to
  >>   be parked.
  >>   + *
  >>   + * @returns: none
  >>   + */
  >>   +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
  >>
  >>    #endif /* COMPILING_PER_TARGET */
  >>
  >>   diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c index
  >>   d7281b93f3..30d42847de 100644
  >>   --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
  >>   +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
  >>   @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static QemuMutex kml_slots_lock;  #define
  >>   kvm_slots_unlock()  qemu_mutex_unlock(&kml_slots_lock)
  >>
  >>    static void kvm_slot_init_dirty_bitmap(KVMSlot *mem);
  >>   +static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned long vcpu_id);
  >>
  >>    static inline void kvm_resample_fd_remove(int gsi)  { @@ -340,14
  +341,53
  >>   @@ err:
  >>        return ret;
  >>    }
  >>
  >>   +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
  >>   +{
  >>   +    struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu;
  >>   +
  >>   +    trace_kvm_park_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
  >>   +
  >>   +    vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
  >>   +    vcpu->vcpu_id = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
  >>   +    vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
  >>   +    QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu,
  node); }
  >>   +
  >>   +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
  >>   +{
  >>   +    unsigned long vcpu_id = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
  >>   +    KVMState *s = kvm_state;
  >>   +    int kvm_fd;
  >>   +
  >>   +    trace_kvm_create_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
  >>   +
  >>   +    /* check if the KVM vCPU already exist but is parked */
  >>   +    kvm_fd = kvm_get_vcpu(s, vcpu_id);
  >>   +    if (kvm_fd < 0) {
  >>   +        /* vCPU not parked: create a new KVM vCPU */
  >>   +        kvm_fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, vcpu_id);
  >>   +        if (kvm_fd < 0) {
  >>   +            error_report("KVM_CREATE_VCPU IOCTL failed for vCPU %lu",
  >>   vcpu_id);
  >>   +            return kvm_fd;
  >>   +        }
  >>   +    }
  >>   +
  >>   +    cpu->kvm_fd = kvm_fd;
  >>   +    cpu->kvm_state = s;
  >>   +    cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
  >>   +    cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
  >>   +    cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
  >>   +
  >>   +    return 0;
  >>   +}
  >>   +
  >>    static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)  {
  >>        KVMState *s = kvm_state;
  >>        long mmap_size;
  >>   -    struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu = NULL;
  >>        int ret = 0;
  >>
  >>   -    trace_kvm_destroy_vcpu();
  >>   +    trace_kvm_destroy_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index,
  kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
  >>
  >>        ret = kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(cpu);
  >>        if (ret < 0) {
  >>   @@ -373,10 +413,7 @@ static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState
  *cpu)
  >>            }
  >>        }
  >>
  >>   -    vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
  >>   -    vcpu->vcpu_id = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
  >>   -    vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
  >>   -    QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu,
  node);
  >>   +    kvm_park_vcpu(cpu);
  >>    err:
  >>        return ret;
  >>    }
  >>   @@ -397,6 +434,8 @@ static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned
  long
  >>   vcpu_id)
  >>            if (cpu->vcpu_id == vcpu_id) {
  >>                int kvm_fd;
  >>
  >>   +            trace_kvm_get_vcpu(vcpu_id);
  >>   +
  >>                QLIST_REMOVE(cpu, node);
  >>                kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
  >>                g_free(cpu);
  >>   @@ -404,7 +443,7 @@ static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned
  long
  >>   vcpu_id)
  >>            }
  >>        }
  >>
  >>   -    return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)vcpu_id);
  >>   +    return -ENOENT;
  >>    }
  >>
  >>    int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp) @@ -415,19 +454,14
  @@
  >>   int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
  >>
  >>        trace_kvm_init_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
  >>
  >>   -    ret = kvm_get_vcpu(s, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
  >>   +    ret = kvm_create_vcpu(cpu);
  >>        if (ret < 0) {
  >>   -        error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_get_vcpu failed
  >>   (%lu)",
  >>   +        error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
  >>   +                         "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_create_vcpu failed (%lu)",
  >>                             kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
  >>            goto err;
  >>        }
  >>
  >>   -    cpu->kvm_fd = ret;
  >>   -    cpu->kvm_state = s;
  >>   -    cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
  >>   -    cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
  >>   -    cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
  >>   -
  >>        mmap_size = kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_VCPU_MMAP_SIZE, 0);
  >>        if (mmap_size < 0) {
  >>            ret = mmap_size;
  >>   diff --git a/accel/kvm/trace-events b/accel/kvm/trace-events index
  >>   681ccb667d..75c1724e78 100644
  >>   --- a/accel/kvm/trace-events
  >>   +++ b/accel/kvm/trace-events
  >>   @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ kvm_device_ioctl(int fd, int type, void *arg) "dev fd
  %d,
  >>   type 0x%x, arg %p"
  >>    kvm_failed_reg_get(uint64_t id, const char *msg) "Warning: Unable to
  >>   retrieve ONEREG %" PRIu64 " from KVM: %s"
  >>    kvm_failed_reg_set(uint64_t id, const char *msg) "Warning: Unable to
  set
  >>   ONEREG %" PRIu64 " to KVM: %s"
  >>    kvm_init_vcpu(int cpu_index, unsigned long arch_cpu_id) "index: %d
  id:
  >>   %lu"
  >>   +kvm_create_vcpu(int cpu_index, unsigned long arch_cpu_id) "index:
  %d
  >>   id: %lu"
  >>   +kvm_get_vcpu(unsigned long arch_cpu_id) "id: %lu"
  >>   +kvm_destroy_vcpu(int cpu_index, unsigned long arch_cpu_id) "index:
  %d
  >>   id: %lu"
  >>   +kvm_park_vcpu(int cpu_index, unsigned long arch_cpu_id) "index: %d
  id:
  >>   %lu"
  >>    kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(void) ""
  >>    kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(char *name, int vector, int virq) "dev %s
  >>   vector %d virq %d"
  >>    kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(int virq) "Updating MSI route
  virq=%d"
  >>   @@ -25,7 +29,6 @@ kvm_dirty_ring_reaper(const char *s) "%s"
  >>    kvm_dirty_ring_reap(uint64_t count, int64_t t) "reaped %"PRIu64"
  pages
  >>   (took %"PRIi64" us)"
  >>    kvm_dirty_ring_reaper_kick(const char *reason) "%s"
  >>    kvm_dirty_ring_flush(int finished) "%d"
  >>   -kvm_destroy_vcpu(void) ""
  >>    kvm_failed_get_vcpu_mmap_size(void) ""
  >>    kvm_cpu_exec(void) ""
  >>    kvm_interrupt_exit_request(void) ""
  >>   --
  >>   2.39.3
  >

Reply via email to