2012/3/23 Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>:
> Following long discussions about where this series collides with cp15 rework
> and whether things should be done declarative as in eepro100.c or imperative,
> I have stripped down the series to the bare minimum necessary for proceeding
> with QOM'ifying the remaining targets.
> This does not mean that all patches were invalid, it's an intermediate step.
>
> Please apply to target-arm.next tree.
> Any further target-arm QOM cleanups can then be based onto it.

Looks OK to me. I managed to balance my wobbly stack of cp15 related
patches on top of it:
 
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/pmaydell/qemu-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cp15-on-qom-on-miniqom

(the third patch which creates QOM subclasses for each cpu implementation
is doing too many things and needs splitting, and there's still plenty
of stuff TODO but it's where I currently think we ought to be heading...)

-- PMM

Reply via email to