On 11/4/24 09:47, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
   Hi,

     Due to security concerns inherent in the design of sprintf(3),
     it is highly recommended that you use snprintf(3) instead.

-    char response[40];
+    g_autofree char *response = NULL;

-                    sprintf(response, "\033[%d;%dR",
+                    response = g_strdup_printf("\033[%d;%dR",

Any specific reason why you don't go with the recommendation above?

While using g_strdup_printf() isn't wrong it allocates memory which
is not needed here because you can continue to use the stack buffer
this way:

        snprintf(response, sizeof(response), ...);

I thought GLib/GString was recommended for formatting, so choose
this thinking mostly about style. Indeed in this case snprintf()
is sufficient. I'll respin, thanks.


take care,
   Gerd



Reply via email to