Replace qemu_bh_new_guarded() by virtio_bh_new_guarded()
so the bus and device use the same guard. Otherwise the
DMA-reentrancy protection can be bypassed.

Fixes: CVE-2024-3446
Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
Suggested-by: Alexander Bulekov <alx...@bu.edu>
Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240409105537.18308-5-phi...@linaro.org>
---
 hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
index fe1313f2ad..bbe8aa4b99 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
@@ -1080,8 +1080,8 @@ static void virtio_crypto_device_realize(DeviceState 
*dev, Error **errp)
         vcrypto->vqs[i].dataq =
                  virtio_add_queue(vdev, 1024, virtio_crypto_handle_dataq_bh);
         vcrypto->vqs[i].dataq_bh =
-                 qemu_bh_new_guarded(virtio_crypto_dataq_bh, &vcrypto->vqs[i],
-                                     &dev->mem_reentrancy_guard);
+                 virtio_bh_new_guarded(dev, virtio_crypto_dataq_bh,
+                                       &vcrypto->vqs[i]);
         vcrypto->vqs[i].vcrypto = vcrypto;
     }
 
-- 
2.41.0


Reply via email to