On 19 March 2012 21:56, Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> wrote: > +#define SIGNBIT (uint32_t)0x80000000 > +#define SIGNBIT64 ((uint64_t)1 << 63)
SIGNBIT64 isn't used, I think. -- PMM
On 19 March 2012 21:56, Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> wrote: > +#define SIGNBIT (uint32_t)0x80000000 > +#define SIGNBIT64 ((uint64_t)1 << 63)
SIGNBIT64 isn't used, I think. -- PMM