On 24.03.2024 21:12, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 3/24/24 12:07, Michael Tokarev wrote:

Unfortunately this doesn't quite work, the following changes
fail to apply to 8.2:

929e521a47 target/riscv: always clear vstart for ldst_whole insns
b46631f122 target/riscv: remove 'over' brconds from vector trans
d57dfe4b37 trans_rvv.c.inc: remove redundant mark_vs_dirty() calls
bac802ada8 target/riscv: enable 'vstart_eq_zero' in the end of insns
385e575cd5 target/riscv/kvm: fix timebase-frequency when using KVM acceleration

The amount of work can be non-trivial for this backport, so I'd say we should
leave it aside for now. If someone has a good argument for this work then we
can re-evaluate.

So, out of 15 patches in this series (minus the first one already
mentioned) - should I pick 9 remaining patches for stable (the ones
which applies) or none at all? :)

Thanks,

/mjt

Reply via email to