On 03/19/2012 09:43 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> A --package-name option could be provided to make it easier to override
>>> all the defaults at the same time, but I don't see why not include an
>>> option to define the full path for confdir, just like we allow for
>>> datadir, docdir, and mandir.
>>
>> No, I'm not suggesting --package-name, I'm suggesting that qemu-kvm
>> would carry a patch to configure that changed a fixed PACKAGE_NAME
>> define.

Actually, the idea of an explicit --package-name is not that bad: the
upstream automake list recently had a discussion on whether it should be
possible to alter the PACKAGE_NAME at configure or even make time, and
the conclusion was that it might be a useful idea, but we'd need to
pursue getting the GNU Coding Standards, autoconf, and automake all
updated to make it a reality, as it is not necessarily a trivial task
from the outset.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2012-02/msg00034.html

> If you suggest making it configurable using a variable on the 'make'
> command-line it would be OK, but I kind of hoped that no modern software
> project would ever require packagers to use configure-by-sed methods to
> set build parameters.

Obviously, since qemu doesn't use automake, we aren't quite in the same
position as that automake thread; and even though we are not bound by
GNU Coding Standards, it might be interesting to see what happens on
that front, to make sure we are not proposing an incompatible solution.

-- 
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to