On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:00:06PM +0530, Het Gala wrote:
> Let me send a proper patch to qemu devel mailing list and cc all the people
> involved.
>
> I have reviewed and tested the change. Have tweaked the commit message
> accordingly.
> I hope that's okay with you Yu Zhang :)
Het - don't worry, I've had it in my queue. Thanks,
=====
>From 694451b89b21b3b67c404cbcfa2b84e3afae0c5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu Zhang <yu.zh...@ionos.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:06:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix a memory issue for migration
In commit 3fa9642ff7 change was made to convert the RDMA backend to
accept MigrateAddress struct. However, the assignment of "host" leads
to data corruption on the target host and the failure of migration.
isock->host = rdma->host;
By allocating the memory explicitly for it with g_strdup_printf(), the
issue is fixed and the migration doesn't fail any more.
Fixes: 3fa9642ff7 ("migration: convert rdma backend to accept MigrateAddress")
Cc: qemu-stable <qemu-sta...@nongnu.org>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@fujitsu.com>
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHEcVy4L_D6tuhJ8h=xlr4wapaprje3nnxzaeyunotrxq6c...@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zh...@ionos.com>
[peterx: use g_strdup() instead of g_strdup_printf(), per Zhijian]
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
---
migration/rdma.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
index a355dcea89..855753c671 100644
--- a/migration/rdma.c
+++ b/migration/rdma.c
@@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_accept(RDMAContext *rdma)
goto err_rdma_dest_wait;
}
- isock->host = rdma->host;
+ isock->host = g_strdup(rdma->host);
isock->port = g_strdup_printf("%d", rdma->port);
/*
--
2.44.0
--
Peter Xu
