> > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 11:34 PM Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 02:28:29AM +0000, Hao Xiang wrote: > > > > Add myself to maintain multifd zero page checking acceleration function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xi...@bytedance.com> > > > > --- > > > > MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > index 65dfdc9677..b547918e4d 100644 > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > @@ -3414,6 +3414,11 @@ F: tests/migration/ > > > > F: util/userfaultfd.c > > > > X: migration/rdma* > > > > +Migration multifd zero page checking acceleration > > > > +M: Hao Xiang <hao.xi...@bytedance.com> > > > > +S: Maintained > > > > +F: migration/multifd-zero-page.c > > > > + > > > > Firstly appreciate a lot for volunteering! > > > > My fault to not have made it clear. This file alone so far will need to be > > > > closely related to the multifd core, so whoever maintains migration should > > > > look after this. It's also slightly weird to have a separate entry for a > > > > file that is tens of LOC if it's already covered by another upper entry. > > > > What I worry is about vendor/library specific parts that will be harder to > > > > maintain, and migration maintainers (no matter who does the job in the > > > > future) may not always cover those areas. So I was expecting we could have > > > > volunteers covering e.g. QAT / DSA / IAA accelerators. Since all these > > > > accelerators will all be part of Intel's new chips, there's also one way > > > > that we have "Intel accelerators" section to cover vendor specific codes > > > > and then cover all those areas no matter it's zero detect accelerator or HW > > > > compressors. > > > > I'd suggest we discuss this with Intel people to check out a solid plan > > > > later when we start to merge HW/LIB specific codes. For now I suggest we > > > > can drop this patch and stick with the feature implementation, to see > > > > whether it can catch the train for 9.0. IMHO this is a good feature even > > > > without HW accelerators (and I think it's close to ready), so I hope it can > > > > still make it. > > > > Thanks,
No worries. I misunderstood you. We can talk about maintenance later on when we have the accelerator changes ready. > > > > -- > > > > Peter Xu > > >
