Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 21:12, Sven Schnelle <sv...@stackframe.org> wrote: >> >> HP-UX 10.20 seems to make the lsi53c895a spinning on a memory location >> under certain circumstances. As the SCSI controller and CPU are not >> running at the same time this loop will never finish. After some >> time, the check loop interrupts with a unexpected device disconnect. >> This works, but is slow because the kernel resets the scsi controller. >> Instead of signaling UDC, add an option 'hpux-spin-workaround' which >> emulates a INTERRUPT 2 script instruction. This instruction tells the >> kernel that the request was fulfilled. With this change, SCSI speeds >> improves significantly. >> [..] > I see we already have a hacky workaround for other OSes > that do something similar. The ideal fix for both of these > I think would be for lsi_execute_script() to, instead of stopping, > arrange to defer executing more script instructions until > after the guest has had a chance to run a bit more. > I think setting a timer that calls lsi_resume_script() after > a while would have that effect.
Thanks, good idea. So something like this? diff --git a/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c b/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c index d607a5f9fb..9931799d44 100644 --- a/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c +++ b/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static const char *names[] = { #define LSI_TAG_VALID (1 << 16) /* Maximum instructions to process. */ -#define LSI_MAX_INSN 10000 +#define LSI_MAX_INSN 1000 typedef struct lsi_request { SCSIRequest *req; @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ enum { LSI_WAIT_RESELECT, /* Wait Reselect instruction has been issued */ LSI_DMA_SCRIPTS, /* processing DMA from lsi_execute_script */ LSI_DMA_IN_PROGRESS, /* DMA operation is in progress */ + LSI_WAIT_SCRIPTS, /* SCRIPTS where stopped because of instruction count limit */ }; enum { @@ -224,6 +225,7 @@ struct LSIState { MemoryRegion ram_io; MemoryRegion io_io; AddressSpace pci_io_as; + QEMUTimer *scripts_timer; int carry; /* ??? Should this be an a visible register somewhere? */ int status; @@ -1152,13 +1154,9 @@ again: * which should be enough for all valid use cases). */ if (++insn_processed > LSI_MAX_INSN || reentrancy_level > 8) { - if (!(s->sien0 & LSI_SIST0_UDC)) { - qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, - "lsi_scsi: inf. loop with UDC masked"); - } - lsi_script_scsi_interrupt(s, LSI_SIST0_UDC, 0); - lsi_disconnect(s); - trace_lsi_execute_script_stop(); + s->waiting = LSI_WAIT_SCRIPTS; + timer_mod(s->scripts_timer, qemu_clock_get_us(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) + 500); + trace_lsi_scripts_timer_arm(); reentrancy_level--; return; } @@ -2294,6 +2292,17 @@ static const struct SCSIBusInfo lsi_scsi_info = { .cancel = lsi_request_cancelled }; +static void scripts_timer_cb(void *opaque) +{ + LSIState *s = opaque; + + trace_lsi_scripts_timer_triggered(); + if (s->waiting == LSI_WAIT_SCRIPTS) { + s->waiting = 0; + lsi_execute_script(s); + } +} + static void lsi_scsi_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp) { LSIState *s = LSI53C895A(dev); @@ -2313,6 +2322,7 @@ static void lsi_scsi_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp) "lsi-ram", 0x2000); memory_region_init_io(&s->io_io, OBJECT(s), &lsi_io_ops, s, "lsi-io", 256); + s->scripts_timer = timer_new_us(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, scripts_timer_cb, s); /* * Since we use the address-space API to interact with ram_io, disable the diff --git a/hw/scsi/trace-events b/hw/scsi/trace-events index d72f741ed8..4456a08ab0 100644 --- a/hw/scsi/trace-events +++ b/hw/scsi/trace-events @@ -302,6 +302,8 @@ lsi_execute_script_stop(void) "SCRIPTS execution stopped" lsi_awoken(void) "Woken by SIGP" lsi_reg_read(const char *name, int offset, uint8_t ret) "Read reg %s 0x%x = 0x%02x" lsi_reg_write(const char *name, int offset, uint8_t val) "Write reg %s 0x%x = 0x%02x" +lsi_scripts_timer_triggered(void) "SCRIPTS timer triggered" +lsi_scripts_timer_arm(void) "SCRIPTS timer armed" # virtio-scsi.c virtio_scsi_cmd_req(int lun, uint32_t tag, uint8_t cmd) "virtio_scsi_cmd_req lun=%u tag=0x%x cmd=0x%x"