On Tue Feb 20, 2024 at 3:06 AM AEST, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 08:31, Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The following changes since commit da96ad4a6a2ef26c83b15fa95e7fceef5147269c: > > > > Merge tag 'hw-misc-20240215' of https://github.com/philmd/qemu into > > staging (2024-02-16 11:05:14 +0000) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://gitlab.com/npiggin/qemu.git tags/pull-ppc-for-9.0-20240219 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 922e408e12315121d3e09304b8b8f462ea051af1: > > > > target/ppc: optimise ppcemb_tlb_t flushing (2024-02-19 18:09:19 +1000) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > * Avocado tests for ppc64 to boot FreeBSD, run guests with emulated > > or nested hypervisor facilities, among other things. > > * Update ppc64 CPU defaults to Power10. > > * Add a new powernv10-rainier machine to better capture differences > > between the different Power10 systems. > > * Implement more device models for powernv. > > * 4xx TLB flushing performance and correctness improvements. > > * Correct gdb implementation to access some important SPRs. > > * Misc cleanups and bug fixes. > > > > I dropped the BHRB patches, they are very close but minor issue only > > noticed recently held them up. Hopefully we can get those and a bunch > > of other outstanding submissions in for 9.0 but this PR was taking too > > long as it was. > > > Peter Maydell (1): > > hw/pci-host/raven.c: Mark raven_io_ops as implementing unaligned > > accesses > > Hi Nick -- this commit went upstream via a different route, and > so it now appears in this pullrequest as a commit with a commit > message but no contents. Could I ask you to respin the pullreq > with that commit dropped, please?
Yeah, sorry about that :( I think I noticed it when rebasing but did not check that I'd fixed it. It's nice to keep gunk out of the upstream so I agree, I will respin it. Thanks, Nick
