On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:22 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Currently ts_tid contains the parent tid after fork(), which is not
> correct. So far it has not affected anything, but the upcoming
> follow-fork-mode child support relies on the correct value, so fix it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com>
Warner
> ---
> bsd-user/main.c | 1 +
> linux-user/main.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/bsd-user/main.c b/bsd-user/main.c
> index e5efb7b8458..72289673a94 100644
> --- a/bsd-user/main.c
> +++ b/bsd-user/main.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ void fork_end(int child)
> * state, so we don't need to end_exclusive() here.
> */
> qemu_init_cpu_list();
> + get_task_state(thread_cpu)->ts_tid = qemu_get_thread_id();
> gdbserver_fork(thread_cpu);
> } else {
> mmap_fork_end(child);
> diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
> index 74b2fbb3938..1d53f708354 100644
> --- a/linux-user/main.c
> +++ b/linux-user/main.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ void fork_end(int child)
> }
> }
> qemu_init_cpu_list();
> + get_task_state(thread_cpu)->ts_tid = qemu_get_thread_id();
> gdbserver_fork(thread_cpu);
> } else {
> cpu_list_unlock();
> --
> 2.43.2
>
>
