On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 8:39 AM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 20:48, Joe Komlodi <koml...@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's possible for a reset to come in the middle of a transaction, which
> > causes the bus to be in an old state when a new transaction comes in.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Komlodi <koml...@google.com>
> > ---
> > hw/i2c/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > include/hw/i2c/i2c.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i2c/core.c b/hw/i2c/core.c
> > index 4cf30b2c86..3128067bba 100644
> > --- a/hw/i2c/core.c
> > +++ b/hw/i2c/core.c
> > @@ -23,10 +23,29 @@ static Property i2c_props[] = {
> > DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> > };
> >
> > +static void i2c_bus_hold_reset(Object *obj)
> > +{
> > + I2CBus *bus = I2C_BUS(obj);
> > + I2CNode *node, *next;
> > +
> > + bus->broadcast = false;
> > + QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(node, &bus->current_devs, next, next) {
> > + QLIST_REMOVE(node, next);
> > + g_free(node);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> This does what it says it's going to do; but I think it
> would be good to hear from Corey whether it's better to
> do this, or instead to call i2c_end_transfer() in the
> reset-enter phase.
i2c_end_transfer() might actually make more sense (explained a little
more below). I'll see what Corey says though.
>
> Mostly QEMU's "reset" is like power-cycling, in which case
> I guess that what we have here where we just forget about
> the in-progress transfer and assume the device on the other
> end is also going to reset back to a neutral state is what
> we want.
>
> Does i2c have a concept of a bus-level "reset" operation?
>
Not really, as far as I know.
On hardware I believe if a reset happened in the middle of a
transaction it would just look like a transaction ending from the
target's PoV.
> > +
> > +static void i2c_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> > +{
> > + ResettableClass *rc = RESETTABLE_CLASS(klass);
> > + rc->phases.hold = i2c_bus_hold_reset;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const TypeInfo i2c_bus_info = {
> > .name = TYPE_I2C_BUS,
> > .parent = TYPE_BUS,
> > .instance_size = sizeof(I2CBus),
> > + .class_init = i2c_bus_class_init,
> > };
>
>
>
> > static int i2c_bus_pre_save(void *opaque)
> > diff --git a/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h b/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h
> > index 2a3abacd1b..49580e30e2 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h
> > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct I2CSlave {
> > };
> >
> > #define TYPE_I2C_BUS "i2c-bus"
> > -OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(I2CBus, I2C_BUS)
> > +OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(I2CBus, I2CBusClass, I2C_BUS)
>
> I don't think you need this change any more ?
Oops, will fix in v4. I'll hold off on sending it until Corey gives
input on the reset behavior.
Thanks,
Joe
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
