On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:54:51AM +0200, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:47, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 10:12, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 09:56:15AM +0200, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> > > > > Check if a file argument is a cover letter patch produced by
> > > > > git-format-patch --cover-letter; It is initialized with subject
> > > > > suffix "
> > > > > *** SUBJECT HERE ***" and body prefix " *** BLURB HERE ***". If they
> > > > > exist, warn the user.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > > > index 7026895074..34f12c9848 100755
> > > > > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > > > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > > > @@ -1650,6 +1650,20 @@ sub process {
> > > > > $non_utf8_charset = 1;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +# Check if this is a cover letter patch produced by git-format-patch
> > > > > +# --cover-letter; It is initialized with subject suffix
> > > > > +# " *** SUBJECT HERE ***" and body prefix " *** BLURB HERE ***"
> > > > > + if ($in_header_lines &&
> > > > > + $rawline =~ /^Subject:.+[*]{3} SUBJECT HERE
> > > > > [*]{3}\s*$/) {
> > > > > + WARN("Patch appears to be a cover letter with uninitialized
> > > > > subject" .
> > > > > + " '*** SUBJECT HERE ***'\n$hereline\n");
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if ($rawline =~ /^[*]{3} BLURB HERE [*]{3}\s*$/) {
> > > > > + WARN("Patch appears to be a cover letter with leftover
> > > > > placeholder " .
> > > > > + "text '*** BLURB HERE ***'\n$hereline\n");
> > > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > Indentation here is totally off
> > >
> > > It only seems that way because the pre-existing lines use tabs, while
> > > I used spaces, according to the QEMU Coding style:
> >
> > It is more important to be consistent within a single function.
> >
> > Regardless of that though, the indent is still broken because the body
> > of the 'if' condition is indented /less/ than the 'if' condition itself.
>
> Well not really, that's because my editor replaced the tabs when quoting
> your e-mail.
The under-indentation of the WARN statement has nothing to do with
reply quoting, it is visible in the initial patch you submitted:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-01/msg06216.html
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
