Hi Gurchetan, > Thanks for the reminder. I did make a request to create the release > tags, but changes were requested by Fedora packaging effort: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242058 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241701 > > So the request was canceled, but never re-requested. I'll fire off > another request, with: > > gfxstream: 23d05703b94035ac045df60823fb1fc4be0fdf1c ("gfxstream: > manually add debug logic") > AEMU: dd8b929c247ce9872c775e0e5ddc4300011d0e82 ("aemu: improve licensing") > > as the commits. These match the Fedora requests, and the AEMU one has > been merged into Fedora already it seems.
These revisions have the problem I mentioned in my previous message: >> The gfxstream ref mentioned here isn't compatible with >> v0.1.2-rutabaga-release, because it no longer provides logging_base.pc, rutabaga was not fixed to use the new AEMU package names until after the v0.1.2-rutabaga-release tag, in commit 5dfd74a06. So will there be a new Rutabaga release that's compatible with these release versions of gfxstream and AEMU?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
