Hi Daniel,

On 19/11/23 00:11, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
This conversion is pretty straight-forward. Standardized some formatting
so the +0 and +4 offset cases can recycle the same message.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Hoffman <dhoff...@gmail.com>
---
  hw/timer/hpet.c       | 55 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------
  hw/timer/trace-events | 16 +++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)


@@ -643,24 +636,20 @@ static void hpet_ram_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
              break;
          case HPET_COUNTER:
              if (hpet_enabled(s)) {
-                DPRINTF("qemu: Writing counter while HPET enabled!\n");
+                trace_hpet_ram_write_counter_write_while_enabled();

Better would be to call qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR) here IMO.

              }
              s->hpet_counter =
                  (s->hpet_counter & 0xffffffff00000000ULL) | value;
-            DPRINTF("qemu: HPET counter written. ctr = 0x%" PRIx64 " -> "
-                    "%" PRIx64 "\n", value, s->hpet_counter);
+            trace_hpet_ram_write_counter_written(0, value, s->hpet_counter);
              break;
          case HPET_COUNTER + 4:
-            if (hpet_enabled(s)) {
-                DPRINTF("qemu: Writing counter while HPET enabled!\n");
-            }
+            trace_hpet_ram_write_counter_write_while_enabled();

Ditto.

Can be done on top in another patch, so meanwhile:

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>

And patch queued, thanks!

              s->hpet_counter =
                  (s->hpet_counter & 0xffffffffULL) | (((uint64_t)value) << 32);
-            DPRINTF("qemu: HPET counter + 4 written. ctr = 0x%" PRIx64 " -> "
-                    "%" PRIx64 "\n", value, s->hpet_counter);
+            trace_hpet_ram_write_counter_written(4, value, s->hpet_counter);
              break;
          default:
-            DPRINTF("qemu: invalid hpet_ram_writel\n");
+            trace_hpet_ram_write_invalid();
              break;
          }
      }


Reply via email to